Please help by answering unanswered questions!
Register and earn badges for helping!


Subscribe to me on YouTube
Follow us on Twitter!

Join our Steam group!
361,785 questions
29,773 answers
2,732 comments
43,789 users
Ask YOUR question:

which is better call of duty black ops or halo reach

+7 votes
which games is better cod black ops or halo reach?
asked 8 years ago in GeneralGeneral by anonymous  

Looking for more answers? SHARE this question:
  

25 Answers

0 votes
Call of duty is more camp and spawn kill where Halo is more run and gun.

Its down to personal preference though, for me it is Halo Reach.
answered 8 years ago by chumush Mercenary (1,574 points)   10 29
+1 vote
I prefer Halo. I preferred the single player in Reach and I think the multiplayer is easier to get into since everything non-cosmetic is available from the start.
answered 8 years ago by louiedog Mercenary (1,020 points)   15
+1 vote
It's all up to opinion, but for me, it's Halo. I'm not really into the whole "corner camping" thing that goes on in Black Ops, but some people are.
answered 8 years ago by xx_blam_xx Journeyman (552 points)   1 1 2
+2 votes
I guess if you are talking about gameplay Call of Duty is somewhat more realistic while Halo feeling a bit more arcadey.

Atmosphere wise you have once again a real world setting vs sci fi.

I for one prefer the halo series cuz I enjoy single player just as much ^^
answered 8 years ago by Shin GenX Mercenary (1,996 points)  
+2 votes
Don't really like both but if I have to chose I will take Blops.
answered 8 years ago by anonymous  
+2 votes
Haven't played Halo Reach.

Black Ops on PC was rather buggy. I'm not sure if the bugs have been fixed.

And the story more is short. The online is a mixed bag. Some love it. Some don't.
answered 8 years ago by xboxer King (32,462 points)   6 11 48
+3 votes
I'd take Black Ops over Reach but honestly they're both pretty mediocre.
answered 8 years ago by CBas Paragon (4,898 points)   3 8 41
+2 votes
I would say I prefer halo reach as once in a while but black ops is definetely a better buy.
answered 8 years ago by bain9321 Mercenary (1,466 points)   1 2 14
+1 vote
Halo reach, every single time. It's just way more strategised and there's way more fun to be had.
answered 8 years ago by smitti9 Adept (760 points)   11
0 votes
Single player-wise, Halo Reach is a sci-fi space FPS. If you like the idea of shooting Aliens and flying around in space, then this is the game for you. Halo has always been known for it's lore, and there is a ton of it in Halo Reach.

Black Ops is a down to earth, more practical shooter. It takes place in the Cold War. It is fiction, though, while a few elements are historically accurate the most of this game is not.

Multiplayer, however, these are two titans.

Halo Reach is heavily run and gun. You have shields, armor, and huge power weapons. It is fun, and made even funner by the addition of armor abilities.

Black Ops is a BIG twitch shooter. In the average fire fight, it comes down to who sees who first. It takes very little effort to kill someone, and is very accessable. However, again.. It takes very little effort to kill someone, so this game can get very frustrating.

 

Be warned, though. Neither of these games are a particular safe haven from prebubescent teens.
answered 8 years ago by mrtowel Prince (27,434 points)   8 18 41
i agree with this. but i still stick to my choice.
+3 votes
It's completely dependant on playstyle and preference of Realism vs. Sci Fi.
answered 8 years ago by ctck Soldier (2,197 points)   1 5 47
+3 votes

would say call of duty black ops it for the PC unlike Halo

answered 8 years ago by Lunamaria Adept (895 points)   1 17
+3 votes
HALO is and always will be the best.....

Who gives a f&ck if its not "realistic".... its A VIDEO GAME

YOU JUST CANT BEAT HALO MULTIPLAYER on XBL
answered 8 years ago by irdarob Rookie (235 points)   6
+3 votes
It depends, Halo:Reach is much more enjoyable to play, and there's fun gametypes like Grifball and Living Dead. That and the campaign is pretty fun, with various new weapons to try out.

CoD: Black Ops is another Call of Duty game, very similar weapons to MW 1/2 and World at War, but i guess some would say its more 'realistic', and more of a 'serious FPS'. That said, the campaign was really fun, with more new vehicles and ways of taking down opponents.

I'd say Reach, but if you can, get both.
answered 8 years ago by alex_158 Rookie (289 points)   7
+3 votes
Completely down to personal preference, personally I enjoy the mass customisation of black ops, but reach's game types and maps are ten times more fun to play, so I'd go with reach personally.
answered 8 years ago by Fielon Mercenary (1,645 points)   1 4 27
+3 votes
I'd say Call of Duty only because it's more realistic ofcourse. and i like the hardcore modes.
answered 8 years ago by ramzrock Initiate (393 points)   11
–1 vote
Halo is more of an action and scream in microphone type of game where CoD is stay in corner with motion sensor

Your pick
answered 8 years ago by l4d2bob Grandmaster (11,115 points)   5 10 48
+1 vote
this games are for different things.

Story:

Halo - long fantastic saga, you need to play previous game to understand what is going on

COD - extremely realistic, conspiracy theories. Real life

Singleplayer:

Halo - vehicles

COD - lots of guns and cinematic moments

Multiplayer:

COD - pure fun, a lot of unlockables, costumes, levels and etc.

Halo - more cybersport oriented, very simple and pure

In my opinion COD is much more better, but a lot of people prefer Halo and there is nothing wrong. It depends on what you prefer
answered 8 years ago by Filoleg Adept (873 points)   18
+1 vote
a personal opinion and if anyone gives you a direct answer they are only giving you theirs.

I prefer COD when im online, but i like halo when i do lan parties
answered 8 years ago by Bear Jesus Journeyman (621 points)  
+1 vote
depends if you care about respawn and realistic. i prefer black ops
answered 8 years ago by drahkos Journeyman (624 points)   15
–1 vote
I prefer Halo: Reach. They're kind of different gaming experiances though. While they're both shoot 'em up games, but there are different maps, game types, and are essentially made by different companies.
answered 8 years ago by Majigama Journeyman (663 points)   5
–1 vote
dont let anyone tell you what one to get look on youtube and see which one you enjoe more. you should get the one that you think is better and that you have more fun with :)
answered 8 years ago by anonymous  
–1 vote
Halo Reach Is Way Better.
answered 8 years ago by jako1001 Soldier (2,144 points)   1 2 8
–1 vote
mother f***ing black ops man. i respect that people prefer halo and i will let them but for me its any cod. mostly black ops. and by the way the corner camping, spawn killing, claymore using dicks are noobs. they are an endangered species. cod is being cured of the vermin. thx
answered 7 years ago by anonymous  
0 votes
it's actually your opinion but if you like future alien shooters then Halo, but if you like modern war games then COD but cod is campin' little kids, but halo has less whiny OMG HAX kids, so i prefer Halo.
answered 7 years ago by DarkCloud0299 Mercenary (1,311 points)   1 2 16

Related questions

0 votes
2 answers
+1 vote
2 answers
+1 vote
1 answer
+1 vote
0 answers